The Baseball Writers Association of America are a bunch of morons
Posted in: SportsWritten by: Grim
First off, let me congratulate Andre Dawson on his election to the Hall of Fame. It is a much deserved honor, and I’m glad to see that the BBWAA got it right, eventually.
One of the great things about baseball is that you can look through a mountain of statistics and still have arguments about who the greatest players of all time are. I can imagine that there are a few baseball writers out there who think “Sure, Dawson was really good, but this isn’t the ‘Hall of Really Good’. I can think of several other players in his era who were better.”
As much as I believe that Andre Dawson belongs in the Hall of Fame, I could understand that there might be an argument on the issue.
Maybe some writers think that only players who are in the discussion of “Best Player of All Time” belong in the hall?
I’m going to pick a list off the top of my head of the “generally considered” best baseball players who ever lived. I’m going to include 5 hitters and 5 pitchers.
For hitters, how about…
- Ty Cobb
- Babe Ruth
- Hank Aaron
- Ted Williams
- Joe DiMaggio
I’d say that is a pretty good list of “Best Ever” candidates, wouldn’t you? You have the former all-time hits leader, 2 former all-time home run leaders, the last man to hit .400, and a guy who hit in 56 straight games while winning a metric fuckton of World Series titles and was frequently introduced as “Baseball’s Greatest Living Player” (which is not even close to true at any given point in his life, see examples: Willie Mays, Hank Aaron, Ted Williams, etc) while banging Marilyn Monroe.
For pitchers?
- Walter Johnson
- Cy Young
- Grover Cleveland Alexander
- Christy Matthewson
- Warren Spahn
I don’t think there is any argument on any of these players, do you? In a game where 300 wins is considered “automatic”, we have a 400 game winner, a 500 game winner, and 3 350 game winners. All won World Series titles. 4 of the 5 were named to baseball’s “All Century Team”.
What do all of these men have in common? Not one of them was a unanimous choice for selection to the Hall of Fame.
Somewhere out there, there was a sportswriter who thought “You know? Babe Ruth was pretty good, but I’m just not sure he’s Hall of Fame material.”
Somewhere out there, there was a sportswriter who looked at Cy Young and said “Sure, he won 511 games, and they named the award for best pitcher in the league after the guy, but I’m not quite sure he can cut it on my Hall of Fame ballot.”
I think I know why there was a sportswriter or two who looked at Hank Aaron and said “Yeah, he’s the all-time Home Run champ, but I ain’t voting for him for Cooperstown.” and I hope those people are rotting in a special place in hell.
And lest you think that it’s the “old fogeys” who had it wrong, let’s take a look at a few “no-brainers” from recent years. Again, just picking 5 off the top of my head…
- Cal Ripken Jr.
- Rickey Henderson
- Johnny Bench
- Nolan Ryan
- Ozzie Smith
Ok, we have “Mr. Ironman”, the all-time stolen base champ, the best catcher in the last 50 years, the all-time strikeouts leader, and the generally acknowledged best fielding shortstop of all time. All were elected on the first ballot. All received over 90% of the votes available… but not 100%.
In fact, there has not been one player in the history of baseball who was a unanimous selection for the Hall of Fame by the Baseball Writers Association of America.
Really? There’s not one guy out there who every voter could get behind? Lou Gehrig? Willie Mays? Mickey Mantle? Nobody?
What’s worse, is now some idiot is going to claim “tradition” when he refuses to vote for Randy Johnson, or Greg Maddux, or Pedro Martinez, or Ken Griffey Jr, or *Alex Rodriguez. If Cy Young wasn’t unanimous, then how could Greg Maddux be voted in with 100% of the vote? If Babe Ruth and Hank Aaron couldn’t draw every vote, how can you justify voting in Albert Pujols unanimously?
*A-Rod, with the steroid/HGH/PED thing might get a few nay-sayers who refuse to vote for anyone connected to that controversy, and I totally get that. I don’t agree with it, but I understand it.
But here is the final straw for me…
I’m going to show the statistics for two players…
Player A:
- 15 year career
- 224 HR
- 1068 RBI
- .317 AVG
Player B:
- 18 year career
- 219 HR
- 1326 RBI
- .303 AVG
Neither player has won an MVP. Player A has never led his league in any of the above offensive categories. Player B has led the league in RBI and batting average once. (same year… guy wins 2/3 of the Triple Crown and didn’t win the MVP that year.)
One of these players is generally considered by sports writers to be a “No brainer, sure fire, first ballot, no-doubt-about-it Hall of Famer” the other was dropped from the ballot after only getting 4.3% of the vote in his first year of eligibility. (You have to get at least 5% to stay on the ballot from year to year.)
So which of these players is Derek Jeter and which one is Al Oliver?
(Answer: Jeter is “Player A”)
After looking at all of the evidence, I am forced to conclude that sportswriters, particularly baseball writers, are a bunch of self-righteous, sanctimonious, self-important jerkoffs who let their own egos and sensibilities get in the way of any semblance of objectivity.



