Kwanzaa is not a holiday, and only idiots think so.


Gosh, I hope I wasn’t ambivalent in that headline.

For those of you blessed enough to live under a rock, “Kwanzaa” is a made up holiday which is celebrated by certain, misguided, members of the Black community in this country.  The only reason this, so-called, holiday gets to see the light of day from the rest of the country can be summed up in three words. “White Man’s Guilt”.

First, the facts.

Kwanzaa is the creation of one Ron Karenga, born Ronald Everett.  Mr. Karenga (He has legally changed his name, so I’m not going to employ the “Cassius Clay” technique here.) invented the holiday in 1966 while a member of a Black Nationalist group called “Organization US“.

We are going to ignore, for the most part, the fact that this organization was at odds with other Black Nationalist groups such as the Black Panthers and that the organization was responsible for killing two Black Panthers over the issue of who would take over a teaching position.

We won’t even focus on the fact that Karenga and a couple of his followers were sentenced to prison.

In 1971, Karenga, Louis Smith, and Luz Maria Tamayo were convicted of felony assault and imprisoned for allegedly assaulting and torturing two women members of US, Deborah Jones and Gail Davis. A May 14, 1971, article in the Los Angeles Times described the testimony of one of the women: “Deborah Jones, who once was given the Swahili title of an African queen, said she and Gail Davis were whipped with an electrical cord and beaten with a karate baton after being ordered to remove their clothes. She testified that a hot soldering iron was placed in Miss Davis’ mouth and placed against Miss Davis’ face and that one of her own big toes was tightened in a vise. Karenga, head of US, also put detergent and running hoses in their mouths, she said. They also were hit on the heads with toasters.

We’re not going to talk about the fact that Karenga is a scumbag because the case against “Kwanzaa” can be made much more easily without those facts getting in the way.

Let’s start with a simple test.

Who celebrates the virtues “Unity, Self-Determination, Collective Work and Responsibility, Cooperative Economics, Purpose, Creativity, and Faith”?

  1. Marxists
  2. People who celebrate “Kwanzaa”
  3. All of the above

If you took option number 3, congratulations!  Karenga doesn’t deny that he “cribbed” these principles directly from Marxism.  “Collective Work”?  “Cooperative Economics”?  Meh.

Then, of course, there is the name itself.  “Kwanzaa” is derived from the Swahili phrase for “First Fruits” (or “First Harvest”) matunda ya kwanza. Now call me crazy, but isn’t December an odd time of year to have a holiday celebrating “First Fruits”?  And Swahili?  Now, I admit that I am no college professor of history, but I do know a couple of things.

  1. African slaves that were sent to North America came primarily from West Africa.
  2. Swahili was spoken primarily in East Africa.

This would be roughly equivalent to creating a Spanish holiday based on Muscovite culture and Russian traditions on the grounds that “It’s all European, isn’t it?”  Now I realize that all white people look alike, but c’mon, will ya?

So we have a Convicted Felon and erstwhile 1960’s radical who is making up a holiday based on Marxist beliefs and a culture that he isn’t even a part of.  That’s a Charlie Brown special waiting to happen, isn’t it?

Far be it from me to piss all over a cultural holiday that isn’t my own.  I don’t write rants saying that Ramadan isn’t a real holiday because I’m not a Muslim.  I don’t claim that Hanukkah isn’t worth celebrating or acknowledging because I happen not to be Jewish.  Hell, my claim to Christianity is so thin that I could pick my teeth with it, but that doesn’t stop me from celebrating Christmas every year.

So why hate on “Kwanzaa”?

Because it is a lie, based on lies, and perpetuated by liars.  Because every time some idiot with an attitude tries to “correct” me by saying “Happy Kwanzaa” every time I wish them a Merry Christmas, I want to scoop out their entrails with a rusty spork.  The only thing worse than not knowing your history is to make it up and expect the rest of us to believe it out of an expectation of racial guilt.  The world didn’t buy it when it was called “Aryanism” and perpetuated by some “German” named Adolf Hitler, and it shouldn’t buy into it now.

Fuck that, and fuck “Kwanzaa”.

Merry Christmas!

-Grim

Obama won… Now what?


Now that everyone has had a couple of days to calm down from Tuesday, what exactly does it mean that Barack Obama has been elected our 44th president?  As usual, Matt and Trey have hilariously shown us a collective mirror.  Seems like half of us think that it’s going to be kittens and rainbows for at least 4 years, and the other half are preparing their survival bunkers for the end of the world as we know it.

There are a fair number of commentators out there who think Obama is nothing more than a reaction to 8 years of George W. Bush.  What I want to know is… How can I get paid hundreds of thousands of dollars per year to make such obvious observations?  Certainly 8 years of Bush has left the country in the mood for something, ANYTHING, different, but it took a candidate like Barack Obama to step up and articulate his message in a way that resonates with the voting public.  Past candidates like John Kerry, Michael Dukakis, or even Hillary Clinton, could not have inspired the voters the way Obama has.

Now it falls on Obama to lead.  Inspiration is only part of the equation, now he has to execute.  Fortunately, if we can extrapolate from how his campaign was run, he appears to be an effective organizer.  Set up your organization and then let your people do what you hired them to do.  That is why close attention will be paid to his initial appointments.  There have been no surprises in his staff choices, most of whom are Democratic party veterans with ties to Chicago. (In other words, people he knows well and can work with.)  These positions are not the time or place for him to “reach across the aisle” as he needs people who can march in lock step with what he has in mind and who are familiar with Obama’s leadership style.

The cabinet appointments, however, will be far more interesting.  A cynic might come up with the idea that he would tap a Republican Senator or two (especially one who’s state has a Democratic governor) for a cabinet post.  This would be an obvious Machiavellian move to tilt power in the Senate further towards the Democratic party, but the Republicans are in the unenviable position of looking bad (and partisan) if they refuse.  Here is a list of Senators who fall into that category, in case you were wondering.

  • John Kyl - Arizona
  • Wayne Allard - Colroado
  • Chuck Grassley - Iowa
  • Sam Brownback - Kansas
  • Pat Roberts - Kansas
  • Jim Bunning - Kentucky
  • Mitch McConnell - Kentucky
  • Olympia Snowe - Maine
  • Susan Collins - Maine
  • Judd Gregg - New Hampshire
  • Richard Burr - North Carolina
  • George Voinovich - Ohio
  • Jim Inhofe - Oklahoma
  • Tom Coburn - Oklahoma
  • Gordon Smith - Oregon
  • Arlen Specter - Pennsylvania
  • Lamar Alexander - Tennessee
  • Bob Corker - Tennessee
  • Mike Enzi - Wyoming
  • John Barrasso - Wyoming

Last, and most certainly not least…

  • John McCain - Arizona

Obviously, the Obama transition team is more familiar with these Senators than I am, but if I had to guess, some senators would be elimated from consideration because they are too partisanly Republican to work well with an Obama administration (Arlen Specter comes to mind immediately).  Others would be eliminated because they have shown a willingness to buck the Republican party line on occasion, particularly with respect to fillibuster votes. (Olympia Snowe, for example)

Possible targets, if I were making the list, would be Lamar Alexander (former Secretary of Education under Bush 41) or Sam Brownback (who has expressed Presidential ambitions, and has self-imposed a term limit on himself so that he will not seek re-election to the Senate in 2010).

This would not be a strategy that you could apply more than once within the Senate or House, but it would satisfy Republicans that the Obama administration is, in fact, willing to reach across the aisle, while simultaneously benefitting the Democrats by tilting the advantage by a vote or two back towards themselves.  In a Senate that appears to be split (results aren’t in for a few races, Georgia has a run-off election scheduled for December 2nd.)  58-40 with two “Independents”, that could be an extremely important vote.

Karl Rove is the scariest man on Earth


Karl Rove scares me shitless.

I am not referring to his personal politics which are no more or less malignant than any other Neocon.  I am not scared of him because his campaign tactics are just slightly less reprehensible than those of Hitler.

This man managed to make Dubya palatable to the American people.

This man convinced John McCain that “Sarah Palin is a good idea”

But most importantly…

Here is Rove’s projection from the day before the election.

And here are the actual results from last night’s election…

For those of you not paying attention, Rove’s prediction is precisely and absolutely correct so far.  There are 3 states that are “too close to call”, and if all 3 go to John McCain, then Rove will be exactly correct.  He predicted an electoral vote margin of 338 for Obama to 200 for McCain.  Obama has reached 338 electoral votes on the nose, and if Rove is wrong, it will be because Obama won one of the three remaining states. (According to the latest numbers, Obama is ahead in two of the three states.)

Whatever else you can say about Karl Rove, you cannot deny that this man has his finger on the pulse of American politics.  The fact that I disagree with his politics in no way diminishes the fact that he is a frighteningly effective campaign organizer.

A new day in America.


I apologize in advance for the rambling nature of this post, but I’ve been taking in tonight’s events from a variety of sources.  CNN, BBC, Fox News, CNBC, even Al Jazeera.

There is a common theme in all of the coverage I’ve seen.  Reactions in Europe, the Middle East, Black America, White America, and Latin America all focus on one theme.  Hope.  There is something magical about believing in an idea.  The belief that you are truly witnessing the dawn of a new day.

Barack Obama captured the moment very well in his victory speech.  Even John McCain recognized the moment and delivered one of the warmest speeches of his campaign.  There were celebrations as far away as Kenya.  I saw blacks, whites, latinos, men, women, young and old all eagerly showing hope that today was a new day in this country.

Tomorrow morning, nothing will change.  The same issues that existed yesterday will exist tomorrow.  However, the first step to fixing it is believing that you can fix it.  Today, I saw a country believe in itself once again.

President Obama has a lot of work ahead of him if he is going to back up that belief and turn it into action.

Good luck and congratulations Mr. President-Elect.  May your hand remain steady on the helm, and may you be the leader we can all be proud of.

It’s over.


Polls haven’t yet closed on the west coast, but I’m going to do what every network is too chicken shit to commit to saying.

It’s over.

Barack Obama will be the next President of the United States.

(Right now, at 10:10 PM EST, most projections have Obama at or around 200 electoral votes.  California + Oregon + Washington = 73 electoral votes, and McCain gave those states up a long time ago.  Book it. Done.)

Get out and vote!


Don’t be this guy.

Don’t get me wrong, I understand his rage.  I know that just about every election is yet another example of the eternal struggle between “Turd Sandwich and Giant Douche“  Here is why it is important to vote anyway.

You do not change the country in 4 years.  It took us many years to become the nation we are today, good or bad.  There will never be a candidate who can make this country into the perfect place for you to call home.  There is no such thing as Utopia.  All you can do is pick the one who is closest to the direction you want to go, philosophically speaking.  Maybe you want a Socialist Workers Paradise or a fundamentalist Christian theocracy.  You’re not going to find a candidate who can take you there in 4 years.  Even if he promises everything you ever wanted in a government, there is a difference between striving for something and actually making it happen.

If John McCain wins tomorrow, we will not become “The Holy United States of Jesusland” on January 21st next year.  If Barack Obama wins tomorrow, we will not have free health care for all and the rich will not be taxed into the poor house by Valentine’s Day.  Governments, especially ours, are not designed to move quickly.  That’s a good thing.  In a nation where pandering to the mob can get just about anyone elected, it’s good to have some brakes on the machinery of state.

The gentleman in the above video is right, kinda.  Your vote will not cause the Earth to tremble, nor will it shake the halls of power and send politicians scurrying about like cockroaches when the kitchen light is turned on.  It is a voice.  One voice in a chorus of millions.  Some of you will vote for third party candidates in order to make a statement.  Some of you will vote because you believe strongly in your candidate.  Others will vote because they believe strongly against the other candidate.  What is important is that your voice is heard.  Even if it is drowned out by others.  Even if you are a lone voice crying in the wilderness.  Your voice will still be part of the bigger chorus.

Refusing to vote because you believe it doesn’t matter or because you believe that “all politicians are crooks”, is the civil equivalent of “taking your ball and going home”.  You’re still subject to the same laws as the rest of us.  You’re still paying the same taxes.  You’re still under the same obligations, but you’ve given up your one privilege.  Your petulance is causing you to behave like the spoiled brat at a restaurant who is upset because his favorite meal isn’t on the menu.

Do you realize that making your voice heard, even if it is for some crazy candidate like Cynthia McKinney, might encourage others of a similar stripe to speak up.  One day, maybe not in 4 years, maybe not in 20, but someday, a politician will notice that there is a large group of people who aren’t being represented in Washington.  They will notice that people like you vote, and that you will vote for a politician who advocates the policies you feel are so important.

Stop thinking in terms of 4 years and take a big picture view.  This country didn’t become what it was overnight.  It took people with a vision and an idea and the patience to make it happen.  Stop whining and start working.  One day your “crackpot” ideas might become part of the mainstream.

Look at our recent past.  Reaganomics was once dismissed as “Voodoo” by a man who later became Reagan’s Vice President.  The notion that a black man might someday be the Democratic nominee for Preisdent was unthinkable 50 years ago.  Back then, some members of the Democratic party were even members of the KKK (One of whom, Senator Robert Byrd, still serves in Congress today!).  Politicians like Ron Paul or Dennis Kucinich might be seen as “fringe” today, but by voting and keeping their names out there in the public eye, someday they might have a chance to kick in the door for someone else.

That will never happen if the voters who feel most strongly about these issues give up and sulk at home on election day.

The man in this video speaks of “walking away”, of “refusing to play their game”.  To him, I would say “Where are you going to move?  Is there some country out there that is doing things better than we are?  Is there anywhere else in the world where you would even have a chance of making things different?”  This is no game, and you can’t quit just because you’re losing. There are millions around the world who would die (and HAVE died) for the opportunity to make their voices heard to those who would govern them.  Think very carefully before throwing your voice away.

Vote.

2 more days…


Tired of politics yet?

Too bad.

The good news, for you, is that in two days will will get a break from the incessant political ads which are about as truthful as a 16-year old who promises to pull out in time.  The bad news is that the sniping will continue until the next election cycle begins in two years.

I’ve received plenty of responses to my last little diatribe, and rather than respond to each of them one by one, I’d like to offer a blanket response.  First, I’d like to respond to one post in particular.  How can you shoot down the concept of government subsidized health care while simultaneously advocating an arrangement shared among extended family (I believe you called it “clan”)?  You’re making the same arrangement from a smaller base.  Instead of looking at all of the United States as “your clan”,you break it down into smaller social units of people that you happen to be related to by blood.  There’s a difference?  You have no problem “chipping in” to help others, as long as they’re family.

There are two fundamental arguments at work here.  Obligation is not something that can be forced upon someone else indefinitely.  At some point an individual must accept responsibility or he will either be negligent of, or actively resistant to, that obligation.  On the other hand, living in a society is a social contract.  In accepting society’s benefits and protections (police, roads, armed forces, etc.) you implicitly agree to obey that society’s laws.  The law is not an “ala carte” menu.  You don’t get to pick and choose which laws you obey and which do not apply to you.  Law applies to all equally. (at least, in theory)

The question that must be answered is “Can government perform this societal function better than the individual, and would the benefit of such activity be beneficial to all?”  In a comment from Data Vortex, he includes a link to a story about a Congressman who votes to give money from the treasury to a family who is burned out by fire.  Indeed, in the story cited, it would be inappropriate for Congress to vote to give money to an individual or single family.  The story fails to pass the test of the above question.  It does not benefit everyone equally.

However, what if Congress had voted to create a trust fund that could get all families who are burned out by fire back on their feet?  What if such a fund were available to any families who needed it?  Such a concept would pass the test of “beneficial to all”, and if such a plan were possible, the government could employ the economy of scale required to make it happen.  It does not answer the practical details of such a plan, and I believe that is our greatest weakness as a government.  Too often, we pass bad ideas as law in the interest of “doing something”.  “Something”, in this case, has to be the RIGHT thing.

I would not support “Universal Health Care” if the plan is “a blank check for every medical procedure”.  Such a plan would invite waste and fraud.  I do not believe that means that there is no solution that would provide benefit to all, but I believe it is a problem that should be addressed, and soon.  I believe that promoting competition in the medical and insurance marketplaces is beneficial.  I believe that transparency in the insurance industry is a good idea.  I believe that if an individual can do better on their own that they should be encouraged to do so.

But I also believe that “Tough Shit” is not a good enough answer to those who can’t.  At some point, it is in our interests to look out for our fellow Americans.  Not on every issue, and not all the time, but at some point it makes things better for us as individuals if we make sure our neighbors are in good shape.  There is a continuum between “every man for himself” capitalism and “nanny state” socialism.  The question is where we lie on that continuum.

Health Care and the concept of “your” tax dollars.


One of the favorite arguments of so-called libertarians is that tax money is their money that government takes under threat of force.  Government, they argue, forces tax payers to surrender the fruits of their labor so that they can “give” money to the “underachievers” in society, and that by doing so, exert some sort of tyranny on behalf of the lower classes in society.

Some argue that government inefficiency is so endemic that the private sector can do things better in nearly every case.  Extreme Libertarian views would have every road be a toll road, every police force paid for by private citizens, and every social safety net run by a charity or other private organization.  Failure is met with the response “Tough Shit”, and to the victors go all spoils.

I’m going to tell you a different story.

I have a friend named Jay.  Jay’s son, Tyler, was born just 2 days before 9/11.  Just after Ty’s 3rd birthday, he started showing some symptoms of illness.  At first, they appeared to be allergies.  Then he started having headaches and nausea.  The next diagnosis was Bell’s Palsy.   After Jay pushed the doctors to give Tyler a CAT scan, they found a tumor on Tyler’s brain stem in June of 2005.  After surgery and more than a year’s worth of chemotherapy, Tyler was symptom free.

In order to pay the expenses associated with his medical care, Jay and his wife went deep into debt.  Insurance didn’t cover everything, and even his friends started a PayPal donation fund to help make ends meet.

When the symptoms returned later in 2007, Ty had to endure more chemotherapy and radiation treatments.   Now it wasn’t just Jay and his wife being stretched past their financial limits.  Their extended family and friends were pitching in even more money.  The community around Jay and his family went to the mat for Jay and his brave little boy.

It wasn’t enough.  Tyler Hibinger passed away last night.  He was 7 years old.

Having adequate insurance would not have saved Tyler’s life, but the crushing financial burden of this unspeakable ordeal isn’t going away just because Tyler lost his struggle.  There is no damn reason that this country and it’s people can’t get together and provide a safety net for families like Jay’s.  There is no damn reason that “We the People” can’t chip in together and provide coverage for families who need it.

“Tough Shit” is not good enough.

If my taxes have to go up a few percentage points per year in order to make sure that no more families have to face a financial burden like this in order to save their child’s life, then I’ll fuckin’ pay it and be glad I could help.  If others want to look at this and say that government is taking their money at the point of a gun, then let’s tell them “Tough Shit” and see how they like it!

“We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

Our Union is pretty fucking far from perfect when citizens can, in good conscience, tell a family like Jay’s “Tough Shit”.  We’re doing a pretty lousy job of promoting the general welfare when we tell millions of our fellow citizens “If you get sick, you’re on your own.”.  There are no Blessings of Liberty to a family who will be in debt for a significant part of the rest of their lives because they had to take care of a sick child.

There will come a day, and I don’t think it’s that far off, when folks look up and see no perfect Union, no Justice, no general Welfare, and precious few Blessings of Liberty.  The step after that will pretty much kill the notion of domestic Tranquility.

If we are the nation that we all say that we are, it is time to step up, pitch in, make sure your friends and neighbors aren’t left to the tender mercies of Social Darwinism and come up with a solution.  Insurance companies aren’t going to do it.  Doctors and hospitals aren’t going to do it.  We have to do it as one nation, under God (or Allah, Buddha, Vishnu, or the Flying Spaghetti Monster. Insert the deity of your choice here), indivisible, with liberty and justice for all, not just those who can afford it.

R.I.P. Tyler.  Uncle Grimmy loves you.

In the Flesh - Starring John McCain


Hard to believe this is more than 25 years old.  Even harder to believe that this looks like John McCain’s dream political rally.

Here is a sign that your campaign is coming apart at the seams.  At a rally at Iowa State University, the heart of “Red State Country”, your campaign starts booting out college students because they “didn’t look right“.  Now I’ll admit that the word “tolerance” makes me itch because it has been overused by the hypersensitive granola-eating wimps who want us all to join in a rousing chorus of Kumbaya every night, but turning away people from your own political rally because they “didn’t look right“?  If your campaign is so worried about hecklers that you have to canvass the crowd ahead of time to get rid of troublemakers whose only sin is “not looking right”, then how do you expect anyone to trust you long enough to let you lead the country?  What does “looking right” mean?  Is there a dress code for Republicans now?  Are you kicking out anyone who isn’t quite white right enough for you, Senator McCain?

So ya thought ya might like to go to the show.
To feel the warm thrill of confusion, that space cadet glow.
I got me some bad news for you, Sunshine.
Pink isn’t well, he stayed back at the hotel,
And he sent us along as a surrugate band.
We’re gonna find out where you fans really stand.
Are there any queers in the theatre tonight?
Get ‘em up against the wall. — ‘Gainst the wall!
And that one in the spotlight, he don’t look right to me.
Get him up against the wall. — ‘Gainst the wall!
And that one looks Jewish, and that one’s a coon.
Who let all this riffraff into the room?
There’s one smoking a joint, and another with spots!
If I had my way I’d have all of ya shot.

- In the Flesh from Pink Floyd - The Wall

There are some things even telemarketers won’t do


I hate telephone advertising.  While I realize that this is a controversial choice, I am prepared to defend my position against the hordes of angry defenders of the right to interrupt my dinner while peddling your bullshit product/service/charity/political candidate.

That said, a couple of things have happened recently that have made me rethink my opinion.

For starters, about 40 call center employees in Indiana walked off the job rather than read a prepared script bashing Barack Obama for things like:

  • Electing Barack Obama will put your children in danger
  • Barack Obama is soft on crime
  • Coddling criminals and putting them on the streets early

Willie Horton, there is a call for you on the white (fear) courtesy phone!

Of course, the only reason they were asked to read this script was because it illegal to robo-call in the state of Indiana.  If you’d like to hear the ad as it ran in other states, here you go.

If you don’t feel like listening…

Hello, I’m calling for John McCain and the RNC, because Democrats are dangerously weak on crime. Barack Obama has voted against tougher penalties for street gangs, drug-related crimes, and protecting children from danger. Barack Obama and his liberal allies have a disturbing history of coddling criminals. so we can’t trust their judgment to keep our families safe. This call was paid for by the Republican National Committee and McCain-Palin 2008 at 866 558-5591. Thank you, bye

Hey Senator McCain, if minimum wage phone monkeys can see through your bullshit, how well do you think this is going to play with the rest of the country?  Maybe you could outsource the calls to India since they neither know, nor care, about you or the American public.

Think about this for a minute, telemarketing is one of the slimiest professions known to man, even prostitution is more honest about what it is than a telemarketer who calls during dinner asking to speak to Mr. or Mrs. So-and-so about something “REALLY important”.  If these guys are saying “No thanks, I have standards.” to your message, then maybe you should re-think the message.

Maybe if you were more like this guy, you could have Sarah Palin do something useful for your campaign.